ఇండెక్స్ చేయబడింది
  • J గేట్ తెరవండి
  • గ్లోబల్ ఇంపాక్ట్ ఫ్యాక్టర్ (GIF)
  • ఆర్కైవ్ ఇనిషియేటివ్‌ని తెరవండి
  • VieSearch
  • ఇంటర్నేషనల్ సొసైటీ ఆఫ్ యూనివర్సల్ రీసెర్చ్ ఇన్ సైన్సెస్
  • చైనా నేషనల్ నాలెడ్జ్ ఇన్‌ఫ్రాస్ట్రక్చర్ (CNKI)
  • CiteFactor
  • స్కిమాగో
  • ఉల్రిచ్ పీరియాడికల్స్ డైరెక్టరీ
  • ఎలక్ట్రానిక్ జర్నల్స్ లైబ్రరీ
  • RefSeek
  • రీసెర్చ్ జర్నల్ ఇండెక్సింగ్ డైరెక్టరీ (DRJI)
  • హమ్దార్డ్ విశ్వవిద్యాలయం
  • EBSCO AZ
  • పబ్లోన్స్
  • గూగుల్ స్కాలర్
ఈ పేజీని భాగస్వామ్యం చేయండి
జర్నల్ ఫ్లైయర్
Flyer image

నైరూప్య

Optimization of Streptomyces sp.A11 Medium Cultivation on Cyclo(Tyrosyl-Prolyl) Production Using the Response Surface Methodology

Rofiq Sunaryanto

The Response Surface Methodology is a three factorial design which provides the relationship between one or more measured dependent response and a number of input (independent) factors. Response surface methodology was used for optimization of fermentation medium for antibacterial agent cyclo(tyr-pro) production by Streptomyces sp. A11. The optimal response region of the significant factor was predicted by using a second order polynomial model fitted to the results obtained by applying the Central Composite Design (CCD) statistical design. Determination of the best production medium of cyclo(tyr-pro) showed among 6 carbon sources used, dextrin produced the highest cyclo(tyr-pro). Among the five nitrogen sources used, peptone produced the highest cyclo(tyr-pro), and the mineral salts group I produced the highest cyclo(tyr-pro) compared with others. The results of optimization showed that three variables (dextrin as a carbon source, peptone as nitrogen source, and mixture of mineral salts) used showed significantly affected to the activity of cyclo(tyr-pro). The mathematical model used, obtained by the composition of the three variables most optimum were concentration of dextrin was 32.55 g.L-1 , peptone concentration was 11.22 g L-1 , and 8.65 mL of mineral salts. By using the composition of mathematic model, cyclo(tyr-pro) was obtained 51.54 mg L-1 (model expectations) and 50.04 mg L-1 from experiments. The differences of experiment with expectation response value was 2.91%. Using the optimized parameters, the studies demonstrated an increase in the cyclo(tyr-pro) was 2.5 fold from 20 mg L-1 to 50 mg L-1