ఇండెక్స్ చేయబడింది
  • జెనామిక్స్ జర్నల్‌సీక్
  • JournalTOCలు
  • CiteFactor
  • ఉల్రిచ్ పీరియాడికల్స్ డైరెక్టరీ
  • RefSeek
  • హమ్దార్డ్ విశ్వవిద్యాలయం
  • EBSCO AZ
  • జర్నల్స్ కోసం అబ్‌స్ట్రాక్ట్ ఇండెక్సింగ్ డైరెక్టరీ
  • OCLC- వరల్డ్ క్యాట్
  • పబ్లోన్స్
  • జెనీవా ఫౌండేషన్ ఫర్ మెడికల్ ఎడ్యుకేషన్ అండ్ రీసెర్చ్
  • యూరో పబ్
  • గూగుల్ స్కాలర్
ఈ పేజీని భాగస్వామ్యం చేయండి
జర్నల్ ఫ్లైయర్
Flyer image

నైరూప్య

Comparing the Shear Bond Strength of Six Adhesive Systems to Enamel of Primary Teeth

Farokh Gisovar E*,Hedayati N,Shadman N,Shafiee L

Aim and goals: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength of six adhesive systems to enamel of primary teeth.

Method: This experimental in vitro study was performed on 72 extracted primary molars. The teeth were randomly divided into six groups. In each group one of the adhesives; Tetric N-Bond, AdheSE, AdheSE One F, Single Bond 2, SE Bond, and Adper Prompt L-Pop, were used. After preparing the flat enamel surfaces on buccal or lingual and applying adhesives, composite was adhered to the surfaces and after 24 hours storage and thermocycling (500 cycles, 5-500�C), shear bond strength was tested with a universal testing machine and mode of failure was evaluated by a stereomicroscope. Data was analyzed by SPSS18 using Anova, tukey and fisher's exact test. P<0.05 was considered as the level of significance.

Results: The shear bond strength of Teric N-Bond was significantly higher than SE Bond (P=0.012), AdheSE (P=0.000), AdheSE One F(p=0.001) and Adper Prompt L-Pop(P=0.001). Shear bond strength of Single Bond 2 was significantly higher than AdheSE(P=0.004), AdheSE One F(P=0.006) and Adper Prompt L-Pop (P=0.006). Mode of failure in all groups was mostly adhesive.

Conclusion: The shear bond strength of etch-and-rinse adhesive systems were higher than self-etch adhesives except for one adhesive (SE bond) and the bond strength of self-etch adhesives were not significantly different.