ఇండెక్స్ చేయబడింది
  • J గేట్ తెరవండి
  • జెనామిక్స్ జర్నల్‌సీక్
  • JournalTOCలు
  • ఉల్రిచ్ పీరియాడికల్స్ డైరెక్టరీ
  • RefSeek
  • హమ్దార్డ్ విశ్వవిద్యాలయం
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC- వరల్డ్ క్యాట్
  • ప్రాక్వెస్ట్ సమన్లు
  • పబ్లోన్స్
  • జెనీవా ఫౌండేషన్ ఫర్ మెడికల్ ఎడ్యుకేషన్ అండ్ రీసెర్చ్
  • యూరో పబ్
  • గూగుల్ స్కాలర్
ఈ పేజీని భాగస్వామ్యం చేయండి
జర్నల్ ఫ్లైయర్
Flyer image

నైరూప్య

Discrepancies in ABO and Rh Grouping in Southeast Iran, an Analysis of 3 Years' Experience

Esmaei Sannei Moghaddam, Sohail Khosravi and Akbar Dorgalaleh

Background: ABO and Rh blood grouping discrepancies are significant causes of transfusion-related morbidity and mortality. Most of these errors occur when blood grouping standards are unavailable or misinterpreted. This study determined the rate of such errors among hospitals in Zahedan, a city in southeast Iran. We also assessed the prevalence of ABO and Rh grouping errors in the Iranian Blood Transfusion Organization (IBTO) in Zahedan.

Method: During the study, 30,254 blood bags were sent to five of Zahedan's hospitals. Pre-transfusion ABO and Rh blood grouping was carried out by slide method. Any sample showing a discrepancy between IBTO and hospital laboratory was returned to IBTO for identification of the error by the American Association of Blood Banking (AABB) standards protocol.

Results: We observed 420 discrepancies in the pre-transfusion ABO and Rh blood grouping of 30,254 units, a 1.4 percent error, among Zahedan hospitals. The most common error was misidentification of group A as O (62 cases), while group B was misidentified as O in 41 cases. We discovered critical errors, such as misdiagnosis of A as B and vice versa, which could endanger the patient’s life. We also noted 20 misidentifications in routine IBTO laboratory testing, a 0.02 percent error.

Conclusion: The high incidence of pre-transfusion blood grouping errors emphasizes the necessity of always using standard forward and reverse grouping tests in hospitals.